Re: [PATCH -mm] do_migrate_pages() calls migrate_to_node() even iftask is already on a correct node

[Larry Woodman]

On 03/22/2012 03:36 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:07:00 -0400, Larry Woodman said:
>
> > So to be clear on this, in that case the intention would be move 3 to 4,
> > 4 to 5 and 5 to 6
> > to keep the node ordering the same?
> Would it make more sense to do 5->6, 4->5, 3->4?  If we move stuff
> from 3 to 4 before clearing the old 4 stuff out, it might get crowded?
Yes, I didnt try to imply the order in which pages were moved just
the additional moving necessary.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/