Re: [PATCH] tcp: bind() use stronger condition for bind_conflict

[Eric Dumazet]

On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 10:52 -0300, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 00:11:52 +0300
> Alexandru Copot <alex.mihai.c@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 

> > diff --git a/net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c b/net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c
> > index 02dd203..dfc8bc3 100644
> > --- a/net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c
> > @@ -28,7 +28,8 @@
> >  #include <net/inet6_connection_sock.h>
> >  
> >  int inet6_csk_bind_conflict(const struct sock *sk,
> > -			    const struct inet_bind_bucket *tb)
> > +			    const struct inet_bind_bucket *tb,
> > +				int relax)
> 
> Same here
> Maybe you can wait for more feedbacks before spin another patch 
> version just to fix that.
> 



Also 'int relax' should be 'bool relax'... 1/0 -> true/false

Anyway net-next is not open yet...


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/