Re: [PATCH] sysrq: Use SEND_SIG_FORCED instead of force_sig()

[Oleg Nesterov]

On 03/28, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 22:52:54 +0200
> Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > No, this depends on 629d362b9950166c6fac2aa8425db34d824bb043
> > "signal: give SEND_SIG_FORCED more power to beat SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE".
>
> oop, I meant "this patch looks like 3.4 material"?

Ah, yes, in this case I agree.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/