Re: [PATCH 2/3] PNP: Allow resources to be set as disabled
From: Witold Szczeponik
Date: Sun Apr 01 2012 - 12:07:08 EST
On 27/03/12 22:38, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
[...]
>> The patch achieves this by doing two things: (1) it allows the strings
>> "disabled" and"<none>" to be used as a valid PNP resource value, and (2) when
>> assigning PNP resources, it copies the flags masked by IORESOURCE_BITS from the
>> resource's templates.
>
> These look like reasonable things to do, but (2) doesn't seem to
> depend on (1), so you might just split them into two patches.
Will do. Actually, (2) solves a problem that apparently had not been observed
yet: When *any* PNP resource was set using the "/sys/bus/pnp/*/*/resources"
interface, the IORESOURCE_BITS were always cleared, which might have been, by
coincidence, a meaningful value. However, once I started disabling IRQ lines,
I've seen error messages in the kernel logs (an IRQ's IORESOURCE_BITS are never
cleared, if I am not mistaken).
[...]
>>
>> If the second part of the patch is not applied, the resource flags are not
>> initialized properly and obscure messages in the kernel log have be seen
>
> s/be/been/
ACK. And will be moved to some other patch.
>
>> ("invalid flags").
>>
>> The patch is applied against Linux 3.3.x.
>>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Witold Szczeponik<Witold.Szczeponik@xxxxxxx>
>>
>>
>> Index: linux/drivers/pnp/interface.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux.orig/drivers/pnp/interface.c
>> +++ linux/drivers/pnp/interface.c
>> @@ -311,10 +311,14 @@ static char *pnp_get_resource_value(char
>> if (flags)
>> *flags = 0;
>>
>> - /* TBD: allow for disabled resources */
>> -
>> buf = skip_spaces(buf);
>> - if (start) {
>> + if (flags&& !strnicmp(buf, "disabled", 8)) {
>> + buf += 8;
>> + *flags |= IORESOURCE_DISABLED;
>> + } else if (flags&& !strnicmp(buf, "<none>", 6)) {
>> + buf += 6;
>> + *flags |= IORESOURCE_DISABLED;
>
> What's the value in supporting both "disabled" and "<none>"? Having
> both suggests that they do different things, but it looks like they
> have the same effect.
These two values correspond to the two different ways to report "disabled"
resources by the kernel: drivers/pnp/interface.c uses "disabled" when
displaying PNP resources and "<none>" when displaying PNP options. (Maybe
the latter should be changed to "disabled", too, but this would be a
change in the ABI.)
>
>> + } else if (start) {
>> *start = simple_strtoull(buf,&buf, 0);
>> if (end) {
>> buf = skip_spaces(buf);
>> Index: linux/drivers/pnp/manager.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux.orig/drivers/pnp/manager.c
>> +++ linux/drivers/pnp/manager.c
>> @@ -18,11 +18,27 @@
>>
>> DEFINE_MUTEX(pnp_res_mutex);
>>
>> +static struct resource *pnp_find_resource(struct pnp_dev *dev,
>> + unsigned char rule,
>> + unsigned long type,
>> + unsigned int bar)
>> +{
>> + struct resource *res = pnp_get_resource(dev, type, bar);
>> +
>> + /* when the resource already exists, set its resource bits from rule */
>> + if (res) {
>> + res->flags&= ~IORESOURCE_BITS;
>> + res->flags |= rule& IORESOURCE_BITS;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return res;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int pnp_assign_port(struct pnp_dev *dev, struct pnp_port *rule, int idx)
>> {
>> struct resource *res, local_res;
>>
>> - res = pnp_get_resource(dev, IORESOURCE_IO, idx);
>> + res = pnp_find_resource(dev, rule->flags, IORESOURCE_IO, idx);
>> if (res) {
>> pnp_dbg(&dev->dev, " io %d already set to %#llx-%#llx "
>> "flags %#lx\n", idx, (unsigned long long) res->start,
>> @@ -65,7 +81,7 @@ static int pnp_assign_mem(struct pnp_dev
>> {
>> struct resource *res, local_res;
>>
>> - res = pnp_get_resource(dev, IORESOURCE_MEM, idx);
>> + res = pnp_find_resource(dev, rule->flags, IORESOURCE_MEM, idx);
>> if (res) {
>> pnp_dbg(&dev->dev, " mem %d already set to %#llx-%#llx "
>> "flags %#lx\n", idx, (unsigned long long) res->start,
>> @@ -78,6 +94,7 @@ static int pnp_assign_mem(struct pnp_dev
>> res->start = 0;
>> res->end = 0;
>>
>> + /* ??? rule->flags restricted to 8 bits, all tests bogus ??? */
>> if (!(rule->flags& IORESOURCE_MEM_WRITEABLE))
>> res->flags |= IORESOURCE_READONLY;
>> if (rule->flags& IORESOURCE_MEM_CACHEABLE)
>> @@ -123,7 +140,7 @@ static int pnp_assign_irq(struct pnp_dev
>> 5, 10, 11, 12, 9, 14, 15, 7, 3, 4, 13, 0, 1, 6, 8, 2
>> };
>>
>> - res = pnp_get_resource(dev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, idx);
>> + res = pnp_find_resource(dev, rule->flags, IORESOURCE_IRQ, idx);
>> if (res) {
>> pnp_dbg(&dev->dev, " irq %d already set to %d flags %#lx\n",
>> idx, (int) res->start, res->flags);
>> @@ -182,7 +199,7 @@ static int pnp_assign_dma(struct pnp_dev
>> 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 0, 2, 4
>> };
>>
>> - res = pnp_get_resource(dev, IORESOURCE_DMA, idx);
>> + res = pnp_find_resource(dev, rule->flags, IORESOURCE_DMA, idx);
>> if (res) {
>> pnp_dbg(&dev->dev, " dma %d already set to %d flags %#lx\n",
>> idx, (int) res->start, res->flags);
>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/