Re: [PATCH] nextfd(2)

[H. Peter Anvin]

On 04/01/2012 12:21 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Sunday 01 April 2012, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
>>  arch/x86/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl |    1 +
>>  arch/x86/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl |    1 +
>>  fs/Makefile                      |    1 +
>>  fs/nextfd.c                      |   27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  include/linux/syscalls.h         |    1 +
>>  5 files changed, 31 insertions(+)
> 
> I don't have any comments on the syscall itself, but when you add one, please
> also make the change to include/asm-generic/unistd.h so it appears in the
> various architectures using the generic syscall table.
> 
> 	Arnd

Arnd: do you have any interest in leveraging the syscall scripts I did
for x86?  I have tried to make them as generic as possible, with the
hope of getting more and more of syscall information into more easily
processed form.

	-hpa


-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/