Re: [PATCH] printk(): add KERN_CONT where needed

[Kay Sievers]

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 18:16, Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Conversations happen all over the place and making
> separate discussions isn't that valuable nor are
> they really controllable.

Sure, but this is not a conversation in that sense, you reply to a
patch that something is not correct, but what's not correct is not a
subject of the patch. And that I need to correct.

> Just write the change log to simply state "add KERN_CONT"
> without mentioning your unpublished stuff.

The changelog says:

"A prototype for kmsg records instead of a byte-stream buffer revealed
a couple of missing printk(KERN_CONT ...) uses. Subsequent calls produce
one record per printk() call, while all should have ended up in a single
record."

What else do you need?

Kay
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/