Re: [RFC PATCH] cpuidle: allow per cpu latencies

[Shilimkar, Santosh]

Peter,

On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 4/5/2012 2:53 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
>> This patch doesn't update all cpuidle device registrations. I will do that
>
> question is if you want to do per cpu latencies, or if you want to have
> both types of C state in one big table, and have each of the tegra cpyu
> types pick half of them...
>
>
Indeed !! That should work.
I thought the C-states are always per CPU based and during the
cpuidle registration you can register C-state accordingly based on the
specific CPU types with different latencies if needed.

Am I missing something ?

Regards
Santosh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/