Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: fix integer overflow in i915_gem_execbuffer2()
From: Chris Wilson
Date: Fri Apr 06 2012 - 15:40:49 EST
On Fri, 6 Apr 2012 14:17:41 -0400, Xi Wang <xi.wang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Apr 6, 2012, at 10:44 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:
>
> > That I agreed with, I just disagree with how you chose to handle it.
> > Rather than continue on and attempt to vmalloc a large array we should
> > just fail the ioctl with EINVAL.
>
> Why an attempt to vmalloc? The overflow check in drm_malloc_ab()
> will simply return NULL and fail the ioctl with -ENOMEM.
It's an invalid value for the ioctl and should be treated as such, not
making ENOMEM more ambiguous.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/