Re: [PATCH] nextfd(2)

[H. Peter Anvin]

On 04/06/2012 01:16 PM, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> 
> closefrom(3) written via nextfd(2) loop is reliable and doesn't fail.
> closefrom(3) written via /proc/self/fd is reliable and can fail (including ENOMEM).
> closefrom(3) written via close(fd++) is unreliable.
> 

I call shenanigans on this.  There is no reason to ENOMEM on the second
written using the fdwalk() implementation I already posted, for example.

	-hpa


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/