[PATCH] m68k: Make sure {read,write}s[bwl]() are always defined

From: Geert Uytterhoeven
Date: Sun Apr 15 2012 - 15:00:19 EST


If CONFIG_ATARI_ROM_ISA is defined (e.g. allmodconfig), musb fails to
compile with:

In file included from drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.h:68,
from drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c:104:
drivers/usb/musb/musb_io.h:45: error: conflicting types for âraw_inslâ
arch/m68k/include/asm/raw_io.h:200: error: previous definition of âraw_inslâ was here
drivers/usb/musb/musb_io.h:47: error: conflicting types for âraw_inswâ
arch/m68k/include/asm/raw_io.h:121: error: previous definition of âraw_inswâ was here
drivers/usb/musb/musb_io.h:52: error: conflicting types for âraw_outslâ
arch/m68k/include/asm/raw_io.h:240: error: previous definition of âraw_outslâ was here
drivers/usb/musb/musb_io.h:54: error: conflicting types for âraw_outswâ
arch/m68k/include/asm/raw_io.h:161: error: previous definition of âraw_outswâ was here
make[4]: *** [drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.o] Error 1

This happens because musb_io.h provides default implementations for
{read,write}s[bwl]() on most platforms, some of which conflict with their
Atari ROM ISA counterparts.

To avoid adding a check for CONFIG_ATARI_ROM_ISA to musb_io.h, make sure
{read,write}s[bwl]() are always defined on m68k, and disable the default
implementations in musb_io.h on m68k, like is already done for several
other architectures.

Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>
Cc: Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
--
Felipe: OK if I carry this through the m68k tree, as CONFIG_ATARI_ROM_ISA
(and this compile problem) is not yet in mainline, and fixing only
musb_io.h now would introduce a regression in mainline?
I could also proactively have m68k provide {read,write}s[bwl]() in
mainline before pushing out Atari ROM ISA support.
Greg: Do you want a similar change for asm/io_no.h? Or move it to asm/io.h?
Or do you want musb_io.h to check for
"!(defined(CONFIG_M68K) && defined(CONFIG_MMU))" instead?
Or don't you care, as allmodconfig never selects nommu anyway?
---
arch/m68k/include/asm/io_mm.h | 12 +++++++-----
drivers/usb/musb/musb_io.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/m68k/include/asm/io_mm.h b/arch/m68k/include/asm/io_mm.h
index eff3f83..73dc331 100644
--- a/arch/m68k/include/asm/io_mm.h
+++ b/arch/m68k/include/asm/io_mm.h
@@ -371,11 +371,6 @@ static inline void isa_delay(void)
#define writeb(val,addr) out_8((addr),(val))
#define readw(addr) in_le16(addr)
#define writew(val,addr) out_le16((addr),(val))
-
-#define readsw raw_insw
-#define writesw raw_outsw
-#define readsl raw_insl
-#define writesl raw_outsl
#endif /* CONFIG_ATARI_ROM_ISA */

#if !defined(CONFIG_ISA) && !defined(CONFIG_ATARI_ROM_ISA)
@@ -415,6 +410,13 @@ static inline void isa_delay(void)
#define readl(addr) in_le32(addr)
#define writel(val,addr) out_le32((addr),(val))

+#define readsb(port, buf, nr) raw_insb((port), (u8 *)(buf), (nr))
+#define readsw(port, buf, nr) raw_insw((port), (u16 *)(buf), (nr))
+#define readsl(port, buf, nr) raw_insl((port), (u32 *)(buf), (nr))
+#define writesb(port, buf, nr) raw_outsb((port), (u8 *)(buf), (nr))
+#define writesw(port, buf, nr) raw_outsw((port), (u16 *)(buf), (nr))
+#define writesl(port, buf, nr) raw_outsl((port), (u32 *)(buf), (nr))
+
#define mmiowb()

static inline void __iomem *ioremap(unsigned long physaddr, unsigned long size)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_io.h b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_io.h
index 1d5eda2..f7c1c8e 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_io.h
+++ b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_io.h
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@
#if !defined(CONFIG_ARM) && !defined(CONFIG_SUPERH) \
&& !defined(CONFIG_AVR32) && !defined(CONFIG_PPC32) \
&& !defined(CONFIG_PPC64) && !defined(CONFIG_BLACKFIN) \
- && !defined(CONFIG_MIPS)
+ && !defined(CONFIG_MIPS) && !defined(CONFIG_M68K)
static inline void readsl(const void __iomem *addr, void *buf, int len)
{ insl((unsigned long)addr, buf, len); }
static inline void readsw(const void __iomem *addr, void *buf, int len)
--
1.7.0.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/