Re: [PATCH] scripts: Make sortextable handle relocations.
From: H. Peter Anvin
Date: Fri Apr 20 2012 - 19:18:20 EST
On 04/20/2012 04:14 PM, David Daney wrote:
>>
>> I think Linus is right and the right thing to do is to switch to using
>> relative entries in the exception table; I am currently testing a
>> patchset to do exactly that (on x86). It also has the benefit of making
>> the table half the size on x86-64. Then we can just zero out the
>> .rel[a]__ex_table section and be done with it.
>
> That's fine.
>
> In any event we want to do build time sorting, this patch improves the
> original sortextable, so may be worthwhile as purely a cleanup. I
> wanted to fix the relocation breakage, even if the eventual solution
> needs to be somewhat different.
>
Yes... let me finish the patchset and then you can look at what is needed.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/