[PATCH] Recommend correct way to submit new version of the patches.

From: Subodh Nijsure
Date: Wed Apr 25 2012 - 17:57:35 EST


Russell King suggested proper way to submit new versions of the patches.
See http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-April/096236.html
Modify SubmittingPatches to summerize that recommendation.

Signed-off-by: Subodh Nijsure <snijsure@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/SubmittingPatches | 12 ++++++++++++
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
index 4468ce2..4b166a4 100644
--- a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
+++ b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
@@ -579,6 +579,18 @@ use diffstat options "-p 1 -w 70" so that filenames are listed from
the top of the kernel source tree and don't use too much horizontal
space (easily fit in 80 columns, maybe with some indentation).

+Please don't thread the posting of a new version of the patches to
+the previous posting of the older version. In other words, the
+initial summary mail for Vn should not be threaded to the Vn-1
+series, and the individual patches for Vn should only be threaded
+to the initial summary mail for Vn. This is to avoid one massive
+thread for a proposed patch.
+
+If you wish to provide a direct reference back to a previous thread,
+please do so via URLs into archives, or providing the message id or
+exact subject of the previous series in the new summary message body.
+But please don't thread each version to the previous version!
+
See more details on the proper patch format in the following
references.

--
1.7.5.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/