Re: [PATCH next 00/12] mm: replace struct mem_cgroup_zone with structlruvec

From: Konstantin Khlebnikov
Date: Fri Apr 27 2012 - 03:45:20 EST


Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 11:53:44 +0400
Konstantin Khlebnikov<khlebnikov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

This patchset depends on Johannes Weiner's patch
"mm: memcg: count pte references from every member of the reclaimed hierarchy".

bloat-o-meter delta for patches 2..12

add/remove: 6/6 grow/shrink: 6/14 up/down: 4414/-4625 (-211)

That's the sole effect and intent of the patchset? To save 211 bytes?

This is almost last bunch of cleanups for lru_lock splitting,
code reducing is only nice side-effect.
Also this patchset removes many redundant lruvec relookups.

Now mostly all page-to-lruvec translations are located at the same level
as zone->lru_lock locking. So lru-lock splitting patchset can something like this:

-zone = page_zone(page)
-spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock)
-lruvec = mem_cgroup_page_lruvec(page)
+lruvec = lock_page_lruvec_irq(page)


...

include/linux/memcontrol.h | 16 +--
include/linux/mmzone.h | 14 ++
mm/memcontrol.c | 33 +++--
mm/mmzone.c | 14 ++
mm/page_alloc.c | 8 -
mm/vmscan.c | 277 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
6 files changed, 177 insertions(+), 185 deletions(-)

If so, I'm not sure that it is worth the risk and effort?

After lumpy-reclaim removal there a lot of dead or redundant code, maybe someone else
wants to cleanup this code, I specifically sent this set early to avoid conflicts.


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email:<a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx</a>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/