Re: [patch 21/29] score: Use generic init_task

[KOSAKI Motohiro]

(4/30/12 4:16 PM), Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Same code. Use the generic version.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner<tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Chen Liqin<liqin.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   arch/score/Kconfig         |    1 +
>   arch/score/kernel/Makefile |    2 +-
>   2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Index: tip/arch/score/Kconfig
> ===================================================================
> --- tip.orig/arch/score/Kconfig
> +++ tip/arch/score/Kconfig
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ config SCORE
>          select HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP
>          select ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK
>          select GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES
> +       select HAVE_GENERIC_INIT_TASK
> 
>   choice
>   	prompt "System type"
> Index: tip/arch/score/kernel/Makefile
> ===================================================================
> --- tip.orig/arch/score/kernel/Makefile
> +++ tip/arch/score/kernel/Makefile
> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
> 
>   extra-y	:= head.o vmlinux.lds
> 
> -obj-y += entry.o init_task.o irq.o process.o ptrace.o \
> +obj-y += entry.o irq.o process.o ptrace.o \
>   	setup.o signal.o sys_score.o time.o traps.o \
>   	sys_call_table.o

Almost patches delete arch specific init-task. But this patch doesn't.
Is this really intentional?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/