Re: [PATCH 00/16] Swap-over-NBD without deadlocking V9

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Tue May 01 2012 - 18:28:29 EST

Next message: Suleiman Souhlal: "Re: [RFC][PATCH 9/9 v2] memcg: never return error at pre_destroy()"
Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: [PATCH 15/16] mm: Throttle direct reclaimers if PF_MEMALLOCreserves are low and swap is backed by network storage"
Next in thread: Mel Gorman: "Re: [PATCH 00/16] Swap-over-NBD without deadlocking V9"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This patchset is far less ghastly than I feared/remembered/dreamed ;)

The mm parts, anyway. Are the net guys on board with it all?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Suleiman Souhlal: "Re: [RFC][PATCH 9/9 v2] memcg: never return error at pre_destroy()"
Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: [PATCH 15/16] mm: Throttle direct reclaimers if PF_MEMALLOCreserves are low and swap is backed by network storage"
Next in thread: Mel Gorman: "Re: [PATCH 00/16] Swap-over-NBD without deadlocking V9"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]