Re: [RFC PATCH v1 3/5] KVM: Add paravirt kvm_flush_tlb_others

[Nikunj A Dadhania]

On Tue, 01 May 2012 11:39:36 +0200, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 15:23 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 04/27/2012 07:24 PM, Nikunj A. Dadhania wrote:
> > > flush_tlb_others_ipi depends on lot of statics in tlb.c.  Replicated
> > > the flush_tlb_others_ipi as kvm_flush_tlb_others to further adapt to
> > > paravirtualization.
> > >
> > > Use the vcpu state information inside the kvm_flush_tlb_others to
> > > avoid sending ipi to pre-empted vcpus.
> > >
> > > * Do not send ipi's to offline vcpus and set flush_on_enter flag
> > 
> > get_user_pages_fast() depends on the IPI to hold off page table teardown
> > while they are locklessly walked with interrupts disabled.  If a vcpu
> > were to be preempted while in this critical section, another vcpu
> > tearing down page tables would go ahead and destroy them.  when the
> > preempted vcpu resumes it then touches the freed pages.
> > 
> > We could try to teach kvm and get_user_pages_fast() about this, but this
> > is intrusive.  Another option is to replace the cpu_relax() loop with
> > something that sleeps and is then woken up by the TLB IPI handler if needed.
> 
> I think something like
> 
>   select HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE if PARAVIRT
> 
> or somesuch is just about all it takes.
>
[root@krm1 linux]# grep HAVE_RCU_TABLE .config
CONFIG_HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE=y
[root@krm1 linux]# make -j32  -s
mm/memory.c: In function âtlb_remove_table_oneâ:
mm/memory.c:315: error: implicit declaration of function â__tlb_remove_tableâ

I suppose we need to have __tlb_remove_table. Trying to understand what
needs to be done there.

Regards
Nikunj

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/