Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] sched, fair: Let minimally loaded cpu balancethe group

[Srivatsa Vaddagiri]

* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx> [2012-05-02 12:31:30]:

> > IOW :
> > 
> > 		balance_load = 0 iff idle_cpu(i) ??
> 
> I think so, even for !0 load_idx, load will only reach zero when we're
> idle, just takes longer.

Right ...so should we force it to select a idle_cpu by having
balance_load = 0 for a idle cpu (ignoring what target_load(i, load_idx)
told us as its load?

- vatsa

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/