Re: [PATCH 2/6] zsmalloc: remove unnecessary alignment

From: Nitin Gupta
Date: Thu May 03 2012 - 01:16:14 EST


Hi Minchan,

Sorry for late reply.

On 4/25/12 9:42 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
On 04/25/2012 09:53 PM, Nitin Gupta wrote:

On 04/25/2012 02:23 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:

It isn't necessary to align pool size with PAGE_SIZE.
If I missed something, please let me know it.

Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim<minchan@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/staging/zsmalloc/zsmalloc-main.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/zsmalloc/zsmalloc-main.c b/drivers/staging/zsmalloc/zsmalloc-main.c
index 504b6c2..b99ad9e 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/zsmalloc/zsmalloc-main.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/zsmalloc/zsmalloc-main.c
@@ -489,14 +489,13 @@ fail:

struct zs_pool *zs_create_pool(const char *name, gfp_t flags)
{
- int i, error, ovhd_size;
+ int i, error;
struct zs_pool *pool;

if (!name)
return NULL;

- ovhd_size = roundup(sizeof(*pool), PAGE_SIZE);
- pool = kzalloc(ovhd_size, GFP_KERNEL);
+ pool = kzalloc(sizeof(*pool), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!pool)
return NULL;



pool metadata is rounded-up to avoid potential false-sharing problem
(though we could just roundup to cache_line_size()).


Do you really have any hurt by false-sharing problem?
If so, we can change it with


I've never been hit by this false-sharing in any testing but this is really just a random chance. Apart from aligning to cache-line size, there is no way to ensure some unfortunate read-mostly object never falls in the same line.

kzalloc(ALIGN(sizeof(*pool), cache_line_size()), GFP_KERNEL);


Yes, looks better than aligning to PAGE_SIZE.


Thanks,
Nitin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/