Re: [PATCH 09/13] perf target: Introduce perf_target_errno

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo]

Em Thu, May 03, 2012 at 02:34:20PM -0600, David Ahern escreveu:
> On 5/2/12 12:59 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >Also it would be better to have it as PERF_ERRNO__PID_OVERRIDE_CPU, etc.
> 
> I thought you wanted subsystem based errno's (PERF_TARGET__XXXXX)
> versus one big set (PERF_ERRNO__XXXXX). Did you change your mind?

Oops, I didn't realize PID being the subsys, then yeah, that is ok.

But that would make it PERF_ERR__TARGET_, as PERF_TARGET__ doesn't
straight away brings back "error enumeration", at least for me :)

But this is getting overly long, ideas?

PERF_ we need, its libperf's "namespace", then ERRNO looks needed too,
heck, make it long:

PERF_ERRNO_TARGET__PID_OVERRIDE_CPU

After all most of the time this will just be inside the function setting
the error and the strerrno function that will convert this to an string,
right?

- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/