Re: [PATCH 2/3] IRQ: allow check_wakeup_irqs to notice level-triggeredinterrupts.

[Thomas Gleixner]

Neil,

On Fri, 4 May 2012, NeilBrown wrote:

> On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 14:54:54 +0200 (CEST) Thomas Gleixner
> <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Why not simply managing the pending bit for level irqs ?
> > 
> 
> Hi Thomas,
>  thanks again for the patch.  I finally made time to test it and it works as
> expected.  I've included it below with a change-log entry and tested-by:
> in case that helps.

thanks for testing. The changelog is great. You know how to make the
live of lazy buggers easier :)
  
>  	for_each_irq_desc(irq, desc) {
> -		if (irqd_is_wakeup_set(&desc->irq_data)) {
> +		if (desc->depth == 1 &&
> +		    irqd_is_wakeup_set(&desc->irq_data)) {
>  			if (desc->istate & IRQS_PENDING)
>  				return -EBUSY;
>  			continue;

I split that part into a separate patch, as it's really a different
issue.

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/