Re: Lockdep false positive in sysfs

[Tejun Heo]

On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 05:30:30PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Apr 2012, Tejun Heo wrote:
> 
> > > Would it be better to release just the lockdep annotation while
> > > continuing to hold the actual lock, or to really drop the lock?
> > 
> > Just the lockdep annotation, I think.
> 
> This is turning out to be harder than it looked.
> 
> In order to release the lockdep annotation, I need the lockdep_map
> which is stored in the sysfs_dirent structure.  But when the attribute
> method is called, all it is given is a pointer to the attribute itself
> (which contains the lockdep_class_key but not the lockdep_map) and a
> pointer to the corresponding kobject.
> 
> Is there any reasonable way to get from the kobject and the attribute
> to the appropriate sysfs_dirent?  Search through all the groups
> attached to the kobject?  Restrict the new interface so that it can be
> used only by attributes at the kobject's top level (i.e., not in a
> named group)?
> 
> Any suggestions?

Urgh... I can't think of anything pretty.  How about just marking the
attr as "I'm special" and let sysfs code override lockdep annotation?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/