Re: [PATCH] broken TASK_SIZE for ia32_aout

[David Miller]

From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 00:32:34 +0100

> bit looks dubious.  What happens when 32bit task makes a 64bit syscall?
> Do we really want to drop upper 32 bits of all arguments in the copy we
> are building?

I basically never intended to support 32-bit tasks making 64-bit
system calls except in extremely limited situations such as ptrace()
so that a 32-bit gdb could debug 64-bit tasks.

Do we really have to support crap like this?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/