Re: [PATCH 1/2][RESEND] x86/pci/amd: Restoreearly_fill_mp_bus_to_node

[Andreas Herrmann]

On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 10:35:05AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Andreas Herrmann
> <andreas.herrmann3@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 11:33:17AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Andreas Herrmann
> >> <andreas.herrmann3@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Once upon a time this function was overloaded with quirky stuff to fix
> >> > resource detection on systems w/ _CRS defects (seems that some Sun and
> >> > HP systems were affected).
> >> >
> >> > See commit 30a18d6c3f1e774de656ebd8ff219d53e2ba4029
> >> > (x86: multi pci root bus with different io resource range, on 64-bit)
> >> >
> >> > Restore the old function and thus decouple it from the quirk that is
> >> > CPU family specific (e.g. it won't work on AMD family 15h CPUs). BTW,
> >> > I assume that the _CRS stuff is working on current systems.
> >> >
> >> > This is required to properly initilize the numa_node information of
> >> > existing PCI busses and associated devices.
> >>
> >> I applied some of Yinghai's patches that also touch this area. ÂCan
> >> you refresh these so they apply on top of my "next" branch
> >> (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/helgaas/pci.git next)?
> >
> > Arrgh, will adapt my patch and resend it (asap).
> >
> >> Can you also be more specific about what these patches fix?
> >
> >> My understanding is that amd_bus.c (1) sets NUMA info with
> >> set_mp_bus_to_node() and (2) figures out MMIO and I/O port apertures,
> >> which are only used when blind probing and when ignoring _CRS.
> >>
> >> It seems like the main change in this patch is that we skip (2)
> >> completely when family >= 0x11, and I don't understand what that could
> >> fix.
> >
> > The patch restores a very old function that was used to detect the
> > nearest node for a PCI bus, so yes it's used to do (1). IMHO this
> > function was totally screwed up with Yinghai's code to do (2). It
> > seems that Sun has (had?) some systems where (2) was req'd. I don't
> > care about this part. But I'd like to do (1) on all AMD CPU NUMA
> > systems.
> 
> Thanks for the explanation.  But I'm afraid I'm still confused.
> 
> First, it sounds like you're trying to change the way we do part (1),
> i.e., the set_mp_bus_to_node() calls, but I think the effect of your
> patch is to stop doing part (2) in some cases.
>
> Second, I am pretty sure that the current early_fill_mp_bus_info()
> (before your patch) does the exact same set_mp_bus_to_node() calls as
> your early_fill_mp_bus_to_node() does.


I want to do (1) on all AMD CPUs that might be used in NUMA systems.

What's done for (2) is very specific to certain AMD CPU families --
some of the register accesses are wrong/incomplete for newer AMD
CPUs. Furhtermore _CRS should provide the required info. I really
don't want to extend all the quirky stuff in (2) for future AMD CPUs.

> Finally, on all systems with ACPI, the set_mp_bus_to_node() call in
> pci_acpi_scan_root() should be doing what you need.  In fact, that
> call happens later, so it should be overwriting the information filled
> in by amd_bus.c.  If there's something wrong in this ACPI path, the
> most likely cause is a BIOS defect, such as  a missing _PXM method on
> the PNP0A03/0A08 host bridge device.

Good point. I'll check what's wrong in this ACPI path.


Thanks,

Andreas

-- 
Operating | Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
  System  | Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach/Aschheim, Germany
 Research | GeschÃftsfÃhrer: Alberto Bozzo
  Center  | Sitz: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis MÃnchen
  (OSRC)  | Registergericht MÃnchen, HRB Nr. 43632, WEEE-Reg-Nr: DE 12919551


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/