Re: [PATCH] ramster: depend on CONFIG_NET for sock_* functions

[Sasha Levin]

On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 10:02 +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> Building ramster without CONFIG_NET would cause linkage issue due to missing
>
> I'd say s/CONFIG_NET/NET/
>
>> sock_*() functions in cluster/tcp.c
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/staging/ramster/Kconfig |    2 +-
>>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/ramster/Kconfig b/drivers/staging/ramster/Kconfig
>> index 4af1f8d..8e334cb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/ramster/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/ramster/Kconfig
>> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>>  config RAMSTER
>>       bool "Cross-machine RAM capacity sharing, aka peer-to-peer tmem"
>> -     depends on (CLEANCACHE || FRONTSWAP) && CONFIGFS_FS=y && !ZCACHE && !XVMALLOC && !HIGHMEM
>> +     depends on (CLEANCACHE || FRONTSWAP) && CONFIGFS_FS=y && !ZCACHE && !XVMALLOC && !HIGHMEM && CONFIG_NET
>
> s/CONFIG_NET/NET/ again, I'd say. How was this tested?

Hm... ran the build again with the patch and noticed it stopped
complaining, but apparently it wasn't enough.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/