Re: [PATCH] mwl8k: Add 0x2a02 PCI device-id (Marvell 88W8361)

[Dan Williams]

On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 14:51 +0200, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 12:25:21AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> 
> > > On 1st sight, logs look fine:
> > >
> > > [21:52:52] <lautriv> [    6.050967] ieee80211 phy0: 88w8361p v4,
> > > 00173f3bdde3, STA firmware 2.1.4.25
> > >
> > > But WLAN connection is not that fast and stable as lautriv reports
> > > (several abnormalities were observed).
> > >
> > > I requested a tarball which includes:
> > > * dmesg (Linux-3.3.3)
> > > * e_n_a (/etc/network/interfaces)
> > > * ifconfig output
> > > * iwconfig output
> > > * iw_phy output
> > > * ps_axu (WPA) output
> > >
> > > lautriv will be so kind to be around on #linux-wireless/Freenode the
> > > next days (UTC+2: German/Swiss local-time).
> > > Just ping him.
> > >
> > > Hope you have fun, together!
> > >
> > > - Sedat -
> > 
> > A new tarball from lautriv with same outputs as before, but now tested
> > with Linux-3.4-rc4.
> 
> The output looks good enough for me to ACK adding the PCI ID.
> 
> Can the firmware being used here be submitted to the linux-firmware
> git tree?

So Marvell sent John a driver for TopDog a long time ago, which he put
up on kernel.org.  That driver was reworked by Louis and put up in a git
tree, but both were lost to the kernel.org hack.  I have git backups of
both git trees.  I put Louis' cleanup here:

http://people.redhat.com/dcbw/mrvl_cb82.tar.bz2

That driver (mrvl_cb82) has the following PCI IDs:

static const struct pci_device_id mwl_id_tbl[] __devinitdata = {
        { PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x2a02), 0 },
        { PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x2a03), 1 },
        { PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x2a06), 2 },
        { PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x2a07), 3 },
        { PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x2a04), 4 },
        { PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x2a08), 5 },
        { PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x2a0a), 6 },
        { PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x2a0b), 7 },
        { PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x2a0c), 8 },
        { 0 }
};

and supposedly works for CB82 + CB85.  The firmware helper for CB82
looks pretty close to the mwl8k one.

The firmware API exposed by mrvl_cb82 looks very close to mwl8k
actually.  I only checked the HostCmd bits, not the structures, so I
would expect a few differences.  There are some commands that mwl8k
exposes that mrvl_cb82 does not and vice versa, but I'm not sure if the
drivers actually use those commands.

Hope this helps.

Dan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/