Re: [PATCH UPDATED 3/3] tracing: Provide trace events interface foruprobes

[Ingo Molnar]

* Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2012-05-08 10:30:08]:
> 
> > On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 06:12 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > FYI, this warning started to trigger in -tip, with the latest 
> > > uprobes patches:
> > > 
> > > warning: (UPROBE_EVENT) selects UPROBES which has unmet direct dependencies (UPROBE_EVENTS && PERF_EVENTS)
> > 
> > this looks to be the only UPROBE_EVENTS instance, is that a typo?
> 
> 
> I think I corrected this in the latest posting I sent on April 16th.
> 
> Ingo,
> 
> 	Since you had asked me to send the patch series again 
> after handling comments and acks, I had sent the set. [...]

Mind sending a delta patch instead? The patches are now 
reasonably well tested and don't seem to break in any functional 
way, so unless the delta patch is really ugly we should try that 
instead of rebasing the branch.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/