Re: linux-next: Tree for May 10 (fs/inode.c)

[Paul Gortmaker]

On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 05/10/2012 02:26 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Changes since 20120508:
>
>
> when CONFIG_BLOCK is not set:
>
> fs/inode.c:1777:6: error: redefinition of 'inode_dio_wait'
> include/linux/fs.h:2476:20: note: previous definition of 'inode_dio_wait'
> was here

Also seen on some arm builds:

http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/6291357/
http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/6291378/

5eff3957ce8d14c2a254844743dfb84e19e7c2ae is the first bad commit
commit 5eff3957ce8d14c2a254844743dfb84e19e7c2ae
Author: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Mon May 7 10:44:29 2012 -0400

    NFS: Ensure that setattr and getattr wait for O_DIRECT write completion

    Use the same mechanism as the block devices are using, but move the
    helper functions from fs/direct-io.c into fs/inode.c to remove the
    dependency on CONFIG_BLOCK.

    Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
    Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Cc: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Cc: Fred Isaman <iisaman@xxxxxxxxxx>

:040000 040000 ae33e2ffd172e4d7e2ad6ed219de32de936548cc
ef2df66b34559dbc0782add108e24a6ef6e4e2ca M      fs
bisect run success

P.
---

>
> Full randconfig file is attached.
>
> --
> ~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/