Re: [RFC v4] UBI: Fastmap support (aka checkpointing)

[Richard Weinberger]

On 16.05.2012 11:38, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
 >> This case can happen if the complete fastmap fits into one PEB, the 
fastmap
> > super block is the first PEB on the MTD partition and the fastmap pool is empty.
> > On the other side, in the worst case fastmap has to scan UBI_FM_MAX_START +
> > UBI_FM_MAX_BLOCKS + UBI_FM_MAX_POOL_SIZE PEBs.
>
> When N ->  inf, UBI_FM_MAX_BLOCKS ->  inf as well. Each PEB requires
> little space in the fastmap table.

No, UBI_FM_MAX_BLOCKS does *not* depend on the MTD partition size.
When N -> inf, UBI_FM_MAX_BLOCKS is still a constant.
--> O(1)

> O(N) would be: N ->  inf, UBI_FM_MAX_BLOCKS ->  C, where C is a constant.
>
> Or did I completely forgot math basics?
>
> > With the current default settings this would be 192 PEBs.
> > So, attaching via fastmap has a complexity of O(1).
>
> No :-) Again, for each PEB you have a little data structure in a fastmap
> which you have to (a) store, (b) read, and (c) process when attaching
> the device. The more PEBs you have, the more you do.

The maximum size of a fastmap is limited to UBI_FM_MAX_BLOCKS.
As I said, in worst case we'd have to scan 192 PEBs, which is a constant.

Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/