Re: Perf record format portability

[Steven Rostedt]

On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 15:32 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 19:48 +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> 
> > for ppc64(record) vs x86_64(report) I got following report on latest tip:
> > 
> > [jolsa@dhcp-26-214 test]$ ../perf report > report.target
> > Endianness of raw data not corrected!
> > Warning:
> > 718 samples with id not present in the header
> > Warning:
> > The perf.data file has no samples!
> > 

What does perf script give you. It looks like Frederic took my code for
this when he ported the original parse-events over to perf. I see the
setup of these variables in tools/perf/util/trace-event-read.c

If you run 'perf script' on x86 from a ppc perf.dat file, do you still
get the same errors?

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/