Re: [PATCH 1/7] [RFC] UBI: Export next_sqnum()
From: Shmulik Ladkani
Date: Thu May 17 2012 - 05:45:50 EST
Hi Artem,
On Wed, 16 May 2012 17:27:37 +0300 Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 17:03 +0300, Shmulik Ladkani wrote:
> > Comment above the function should have been changed too.
> > (look for the "next_sqnum - get next sequence number" comment)
>
> I do not think we should make these non-static. We should re-use the
> entire scan_peb() function instead to scan the fastmap internal volume.
Sorry, couldn't follow you.
The new (outside eba.c) calls to 'ubi_next_sqnum' are from
'ubi_write_fastmap' (called from the 'ubi_update_fastmap' interface,
implemented in fastmap.c) - during construction of VID headers of the
FM_SB and FM_FATA.
IMO this is reasonable.
Do you suggest to somehow use existing ubi_eba_write_xxx functions?
Or place the FM_SB/FM_DATA peb writing funtions into eba.c?
Regards,
Shmulik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/