Re: [rfc 0/4] procfs fdinfo extension

From: Pavel Emelyanov
Date: Thu May 17 2012 - 12:29:30 EST

Next message: David Daney: "Re: [PATCH -rt] MIPS: Octeon: convert smp_reserve_lock to raw spinlock"
Previous message: Cyrill Gorcunov: "[rfc 1/4] procfs: Move /proc/pid/fd[info] handling code to fd.[ch]"
In reply to: Cyrill Gorcunov: "[rfc 1/4] procfs: Move /proc/pid/fd[info] handling code to fd.[ch]"
Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: [rfc 0/4] procfs fdinfo extension"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> (I've been said that idea of extending fdinfo to provide
> additional data snippets was approved on LSF this year.
> Am I right, Pavel?)

Yes, you are.

> Any comments and complains are highly appreciated!
>
> Cyrill
> .
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: David Daney: "Re: [PATCH -rt] MIPS: Octeon: convert smp_reserve_lock to raw spinlock"
Previous message: Cyrill Gorcunov: "[rfc 1/4] procfs: Move /proc/pid/fd[info] handling code to fd.[ch]"
In reply to: Cyrill Gorcunov: "[rfc 1/4] procfs: Move /proc/pid/fd[info] handling code to fd.[ch]"
Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: [rfc 0/4] procfs fdinfo extension"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]