Re: [PATCH 4/4] slub: refactoring unfreeze_partials()
From: Christoph Lameter
Date: Thu May 17 2012 - 14:30:57 EST
On Fri, 18 May 2012, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> I think that these are disadvantages of current implementation,
> so I do refactoring unfreeze_partials().
The reason the current implementation is so complex is to avoid races. The
state of the list and the state of the partial pages must be consistent at
all times.
> Minimizing code in do {} while loop introduce a reduced fail rate
> of cmpxchg_double_slab. Below is output of 'slabinfo -r kmalloc-256'
> when './perf stat -r 33 hackbench 50 process 4000 > /dev/null' is done.
Looks good. If I can convince myself that this does not open up any
new races then I may ack it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/