[PATCH EDAC v26 22/66] i82860_edac: convert driver to use the new edac ABI
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Date: Fri May 18 2012 - 12:38:50 EST
The legacy edac ABI is going to be removed. Port the driver to use
and benefit from the new API functionality.
Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/edac/i82860_edac.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/edac/i82860_edac.c b/drivers/edac/i82860_edac.c
index 8485bbf..8834e4e 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/i82860_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/i82860_edac.c
@@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ static int i82860_process_error_info(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
struct i82860_error_info *info,
int handle_errors)
{
+ struct dimm_info *dimm;
int row;
if (!(info->errsts2 & 0x0003))
@@ -108,18 +109,25 @@ static int i82860_process_error_info(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
return 1;
if ((info->errsts ^ info->errsts2) & 0x0003) {
- edac_mc_handle_ce_no_info(mci, "UE overwrote CE");
+ edac_mc_handle_error(HW_EVENT_ERR_UNCORRECTED, mci, 0, 0, 0,
+ -1, -1, -1, "UE overwrote CE", "", NULL);
info->errsts = info->errsts2;
}
info->eap >>= PAGE_SHIFT;
row = edac_mc_find_csrow_by_page(mci, info->eap);
+ dimm = mci->csrows[row].channels[0].dimm;
if (info->errsts & 0x0002)
- edac_mc_handle_ue(mci, info->eap, 0, row, "i82860 UE");
+ edac_mc_handle_error(HW_EVENT_ERR_UNCORRECTED, mci,
+ info->eap, 0, 0,
+ dimm->location[0], dimm->location[1], -1,
+ "i82860 UE", "", NULL);
else
- edac_mc_handle_ce(mci, info->eap, 0, info->derrsyn, row, 0,
- "i82860 UE");
+ edac_mc_handle_error(HW_EVENT_ERR_UNCORRECTED, mci,
+ info->eap, 0, info->derrsyn,
+ dimm->location[0], dimm->location[1], -1,
+ "i82860 CE", "", NULL);
return 1;
}
@@ -179,18 +187,26 @@ static void i82860_init_csrows(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, struct pci_dev *pdev)
static int i82860_probe1(struct pci_dev *pdev, int dev_idx)
{
struct mem_ctl_info *mci;
+ struct edac_mc_layer layers[2];
struct i82860_error_info discard;
- /* RDRAM has channels but these don't map onto the abstractions that
- edac uses.
- The device groups from the GRA registers seem to map reasonably
- well onto the notion of a chip select row.
- There are 16 GRA registers and since the name is associated with
- the channel and the GRA registers map to physical devices so we are
- going to make 1 channel for group.
+ /*
+ * RDRAM has channels but these don't map onto the csrow abstraction.
+ * According with the datasheet, there are 2 Rambus channels, supporting
+ * up to 16 direct RDRAM devices.
+ * The device groups from the GRA registers seem to map reasonably
+ * well onto the notion of a chip select row.
+ * There are 16 GRA registers and since the name is associated with
+ * the channel and the GRA registers map to physical devices so we are
+ * going to make 1 channel for group.
*/
- mci = edac_mc_alloc(0, 16, 1, 0);
-
+ layers[0].type = EDAC_MC_LAYER_CHANNEL;
+ layers[0].size = 2;
+ layers[0].is_virt_csrow = true;
+ layers[1].type = EDAC_MC_LAYER_SLOT;
+ layers[1].size = 8;
+ layers[1].is_virt_csrow = true;
+ mci = new_edac_mc_alloc(0, ARRAY_SIZE(layers), layers, 0);
if (!mci)
return -ENOMEM;
--
1.7.8
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/