Re: [PATCH] tracing: Merge separate resize loops

[Vaibhav Nagarnaik]

On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 8:19 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> But if there were updates on a offline CPU, then the original patch
> would not have set this to zero at the end.

Right.

> Or are you just saying that we don't need to set this to zero, as it
> isn't used later on? And when we re-enter this function (where its the
> only place, and what it calls, that uses nr_page_to_update), it gets
> reset.
>
> IOW, this reset is just a "clean up" of the nr_pages_to_update. Right?

Yes, that's exactly right and a much better way to put it :)

It's just a reset which isn't strictly needed since nr_pages_to_update
gets initialized before it is used and isn't used after resize
operation.


Vaibhav Nagarnaik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/