Re: [PATCH] regulator: tps65910: fixed build error

[Samuel Ortiz]

Hi Laxman,

On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 05:27:25PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> Some of the api calls are not changed and it leads
> to following build error:
> /regulator/tps65910-regulator.c: In function 'tps65910_enable':
> /regulator/tps65910-regulator.c:491:2: error: implicit declaration of
> function 'tps65910_set_bits'
> /regulator/tps65910-regulator.c: In function 'tps65910_disable':
> /regulator/tps65910-regulator.c:504:2: error: implicit declaration of
> function 'tps65910_clear_bits'
> /regulator/tps65910-regulator.c: In function 'tps65910_get_voltage':
> /regulator/tps65910-regulator.c:628:2: warning: passing argument 1 of
> 'tps65910_reg_read' from incompatible pointer type]
> /linux/mfd/tps65910.h:856:19: note: expected 'struct tps65910 *' but
> argument is of type 'struct tps65910_reg *'
> /regulator/tps65910-regulator.c:628:2: error: too few arguments to
> function 'tps65910_reg_read'
> 
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> 
> Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> This patch fixes the compilation error in Samuel's tree and should go
> through Samuel's for-next.
Thanks, I squashed this one into the initial patch.

Cheers,
Samuel.

-- 
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/