Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: (POWER) Replace pseries_notify_cpuidle_addcall with a elegant notifier to fix lockdep problem in start_secondary

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt]

On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 10:47 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:

> Any reason why you don't do cpuidle_disable_device() when the
> CPU is going offline and cpuidle_enable_device() when it's coming
> back ?
> 
> I'm applying the patch for now since it fixes a real problem but
> if the above makes sense, please send a followup fix.

No I'm not ... it's damaged in some odd ways (some whitespace
missing here or there among others). Please resend a fixed one.

Cheers,
Ben.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/