Re: [-next regression] TCP window full with EPOLLWAKEUP
From: Jiri Slaby
Date: Mon May 21 2012 - 09:55:22 EST
On 05/20/2012 08:34 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sunday, May 20, 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Sunday, May 20, 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Sunday, May 20, 2012, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> a bisection shows that with the following commit from -next:
>>>> commit 4d7e30d98939a0340022ccd49325a3d70f7e0238
>>>> Author: Arve HjÃnnevÃg <arve@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Date: Tue May 1 21:33:34 2012 +0200
>>>>
>>>> epoll: Add a flag, EPOLLWAKEUP, to prevent suspend while epoll
>>>> events are ready
>>>>
>>>> ====
>>>>
>>>> one of mono programs I use stops receiving data from the network.
>>>> Wireshark shows that the TCP window of a connection is filled. This
>>>> means the program does not read the data fast enough after requesting
>>>> the data.
>>>>
>>>> If I revert that commit on the top of -next (20120518), everything works
>>>> as expected.
>>>
>>> Hmm. I suppose that the failing program doesn't set EPOLLWAKEUP by mistake,
>>> does it?
>>
>> If it doesn't, we can assume that epi-ws is always NULL and all of the added
>> overhead comes from the function calls. So, I wonder if the appended patch
>> makes any difference?
>
> Having thought more about this I have to say this doesn't seem to make much
> sense, because in that case you'd see some progress, although probably a bit
> slower than before.
>
> So, I think what happens is that the application tries to set EPOLLWAKEUP,
> but doesn't have the capability, so the entire operation fails for it, but
> it doesn't check the return value.
>
> I wonder if the following helps, then.
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>
>
> ---
> fs/eventpoll.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: linux/fs/eventpoll.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/fs/eventpoll.c
> +++ linux/fs/eventpoll.c
> @@ -1711,7 +1711,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(epoll_ctl, int, epfd, in
>
> /* Check if EPOLLWAKEUP is allowed */
> if ((epds.events & EPOLLWAKEUP) && !capable(CAP_EPOLLWAKEUP))
> - goto error_tgt_fput;
> + epds.events &= ~EPOLLWAKEUP;
Yes, this fixed the issue.
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/