Re: UMH_WAIT_EXEC->UMH_WAIT_PROC deadlock

[Oleg Nesterov]

forgot to mention...

On 05/21, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> Another issue is that Tejun dislikes the usage of system_unbound_wq.
> I guess, because WQ_UNBOUND implies WQ_HIGHPRI. Btw, I do not really
> understand why. And, otoh, I don't think that __call_usermodehelper()
> should be bound to any CPU, this would look a bit strange to me.

and please note that currently khelper_wq is WQ_UNBOUND anyway.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/