[PATCH 3/4]net:ipv6:fixed spacing issues related to < operator
From: Jeffrin Jose
Date: Mon May 21 2012 - 15:00:56 EST
Fixed spacing issues relating to < operator
found in net/ipv6/mcast.c by checkpatch.pl tool
Signed-off-by: Jeffrin Jose <ahiliation@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/ipv6/mcast.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/mcast.c b/net/ipv6/mcast.c
index 66235a0..541893d 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/mcast.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/mcast.c
@@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ int ip6_mc_source(int add, int omode, struct sock *sk,
if (!psl)
goto done; /* err = -EADDRNOTAVAIL */
rv = !0;
- for (i = 0; i<psl->sl_count; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < psl->sl_count; i++) {
rv = memcmp(&psl->sl_addr[i], source,
sizeof(struct in6_addr));
if (rv == 0)
@@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ int ip6_mc_source(int add, int omode, struct sock *sk,
/* update the interface filter */
ip6_mc_del_src(idev, group, omode, 1, source, 1);
- for (j = i+1; j<psl->sl_count; j++)
+ for (j = i+1; j < psl->sl_count; j++)
psl->sl_addr[j-1] = psl->sl_addr[j];
psl->sl_count--;
err = 0;
@@ -413,14 +413,14 @@ int ip6_mc_source(int add, int omode, struct sock *sk,
newpsl->sl_max = count;
newpsl->sl_count = count - IP6_SFBLOCK;
if (psl) {
- for (i = 0; i<psl->sl_count; i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < psl->sl_count; i++)
newpsl->sl_addr[i] = psl->sl_addr[i];
sock_kfree_s(sk, psl, IP6_SFLSIZE(psl->sl_max));
}
pmc->sflist = psl = newpsl;
}
rv = 1; /* > 0 for insert logic below if sl_count is 0 */
- for (i = 0; i<psl->sl_count; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < psl->sl_count; i++) {
rv = memcmp(&psl->sl_addr[i], source, sizeof(struct in6_addr));
if (rv == 0)
break;
@@ -496,7 +496,7 @@ int ip6_mc_msfilter(struct sock *sk, struct group_filter *gsf)
goto done;
}
newpsl->sl_max = newpsl->sl_count = gsf->gf_numsrc;
- for (i = 0; i<newpsl->sl_count; ++i) {
+ for (i = 0; i < newpsl->sl_count; ++i) {
struct sockaddr_in6 *psin6;
psin6 = (struct sockaddr_in6 *)&gsf->gf_slist[i];
@@ -588,7 +588,7 @@ int ip6_mc_msfget(struct sock *sk, struct group_filter *gsf,
* on ipv6_sk_mc_lock and a write lock on pmc->sflock. We
* have the socket lock, so reading here is safe.
*/
- for (i = 0; i<copycount; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < copycount; i++) {
struct sockaddr_in6 *psin6;
struct sockaddr_storage ss;
@@ -630,7 +630,7 @@ int inet6_mc_check(struct sock *sk, const struct in6_addr *mc_addr,
} else {
int i;
- for (i = 0; i<psl->sl_count; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < psl->sl_count; i++) {
if (ipv6_addr_equal(&psl->sl_addr[i], src_addr))
break;
}
@@ -1056,7 +1056,7 @@ static int mld_xmarksources(struct ifmcaddr6 *pmc, int nsrcs,
for (psf = pmc->mca_sources; psf; psf = psf->sf_next) {
if (scount == nsrcs)
break;
- for (i = 0; i<nsrcs; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < nsrcs; i++) {
/* skip inactive filters */
if (psf->sf_count[MCAST_INCLUDE] ||
pmc->mca_sfcount[MCAST_EXCLUDE] !=
@@ -1089,7 +1089,7 @@ static int mld_marksources(struct ifmcaddr6 *pmc, int nsrcs,
for (psf = pmc->mca_sources; psf; psf = psf->sf_next) {
if (scount == nsrcs)
break;
- for (i = 0; i<nsrcs; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < nsrcs; i++) {
if (ipv6_addr_equal(&srcs[i], &psf->sf_addr)) {
psf->sf_gsresp = 1;
scount++;
@@ -1873,7 +1873,7 @@ static int ip6_mc_del_src(struct inet6_dev *idev, const struct in6_addr *pmca,
pmc->mca_sfcount[sfmode]--;
}
err = 0;
- for (i = 0; i<sfcount; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < sfcount; i++) {
int rv = ip6_mc_del1_src(pmc, sfmode, &psfsrc[i]);
changerec |= rv > 0;
@@ -2033,7 +2033,7 @@ static int ip6_mc_add_src(struct inet6_dev *idev, const struct in6_addr *pmca,
if (!delta)
pmc->mca_sfcount[sfmode]++;
err = 0;
- for (i = 0; i<sfcount; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < sfcount; i++) {
err = ip6_mc_add1_src(pmc, sfmode, &psfsrc[i]);
if (err)
break;
@@ -2043,7 +2043,7 @@ static int ip6_mc_add_src(struct inet6_dev *idev, const struct in6_addr *pmca,
if (!delta)
pmc->mca_sfcount[sfmode]--;
- for (j = 0; j<i; j++)
+ for (j = 0; j < i; j++)
ip6_mc_del1_src(pmc, sfmode, &psfsrc[j]);
} else if (isexclude != (pmc->mca_sfcount[MCAST_EXCLUDE] != 0)) {
struct ip6_sf_list *psf;
--
1.7.10
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/