Re: [PATCH RFC v2 2/2] pinctrl: add pinctrl gpio binding support

[Dong Aisheng]

On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 04:05:46AM +0800, Stephen Warren wrote:
...
> > +			np_gpio = of_find_node_by_phandle(phandle);
> > +			if (!np_gpio) {
> > +				dev_err(pctldev->dev,
> > +					"failed to find gpio node(%s)\n",
> > +					np_gpio->name);
> 
> Perhaps devm_kfree(ranges) here so that if this is called multiple times
> due to deferred probe, the allocations from the failed attempts don't
> accumulate. Same for other error paths.
> 
I checked a bit more, it seems the resource will be removed first if there's
a deffer probe error.
static int really_probe(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *drv)
{
.....
probe_failed:
        devres_release_all(dev);
        driver_sysfs_remove(dev);
        dev->driver = NULL;

        if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
                /* Driver requested deferred probing */
                dev_info(dev, "Driver %s requests probe deferral\n", drv->name);
                driver_deferred_probe_add(dev);
		...
	}
So we may not need devm_kfree for the EPROBE_DEFER error here.
It looks to me reasonable that managed resource covers the defer probe
error.

Regards
Dong Aisheng

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/