NMI vs #PF clash

From: Avi Kivity
Date: Tue May 22 2012 - 08:53:45 EST


The recent changes to NMI allow exceptions to take place in NMI
handlers, but I think that a #PF (say, due to access to vmalloc space)
is still problematic. Consider the sequence

#PF (cr2 set by processor)
NMI
...
#PF (cr2 clobbered)
do_page_fault()
IRET
...
IRET
do_page_fault()
address = read_cr2()

The last line reads the overwritten cr2 value.

I vaguely remember some discussion about this back in the day, but I
can't find anything in the code to save/restore cr2 in the NMI handler.
Did I miss it? Or perhaps the page fault handler ignores the incorrect
cr2 and IRETs, to fault back immediately?

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/