[PATCH] Use test_and_clear_bit() instead atomic_dec_and_test() for stop_machine

From: OGAWA Hirofumi
Date: Tue May 22 2012 - 14:11:52 EST


[forgot to Cc: lkml, resend]

Hi,

Maybe, nobody using debug patch in atomic_dec_and_test()... Well,
anyway, how about this?



stop_machine_first is just to see if it is first one or not. So, there
is no reason to use atomic_dec_and_test(), and makes the value below 0.

I think it is not desirable, because this usage only triggers
atomic_dec_and_test() underflow debug patch. (the patch tests result
of atomic_dec_and_test() is < 0)

So, this uses test_and_clear_bit() instead.

Signed-off-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff -puN arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c~stop_machine-use-test_and_set_bit arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
--- linux/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c~stop_machine-use-test_and_set_bit 2012-05-23 02:48:01.000000000 +0900
+++ linux-hirofumi/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c 2012-05-23 02:48:01.000000000 +0900
@@ -650,7 +650,7 @@ void *__kprobes text_poke(void *addr, co
* Cross-modifying kernel text with stop_machine().
* This code originally comes from immediate value.
*/
-static atomic_t stop_machine_first;
+static unsigned long stop_machine_first;
static int wrote_text;

struct text_poke_params {
@@ -664,7 +664,7 @@ static int __kprobes stop_machine_text_p
struct text_poke_param *p;
int i;

- if (atomic_dec_and_test(&stop_machine_first)) {
+ if (test_and_clear_bit(0, &stop_machine_first)) {
for (i = 0; i < tpp->nparams; i++) {
p = &tpp->params[i];
text_poke(p->addr, p->opcode, p->len);
@@ -714,7 +714,7 @@ void *__kprobes text_poke_smp(void *addr
p.len = len;
tpp.params = &p;
tpp.nparams = 1;
- atomic_set(&stop_machine_first, 1);
+ stop_machine_first = 1;
wrote_text = 0;
/* Use __stop_machine() because the caller already got online_cpus. */
__stop_machine(stop_machine_text_poke, (void *)&tpp, cpu_online_mask);
@@ -736,7 +736,7 @@ void __kprobes text_poke_smp_batch(struc
{
struct text_poke_params tpp = {.params = params, .nparams = n};

- atomic_set(&stop_machine_first, 1);
+ stop_machine_first = 1;
wrote_text = 0;
__stop_machine(stop_machine_text_poke, (void *)&tpp, cpu_online_mask);
}
_

--
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/