Re: [PATCH] slab+slob: dup name string

[Dave Chinner]

On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 06:50:57PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
> On 05/23/2012 06:48 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> >On Wed, 23 May 2012, James Bottomley wrote:
> >
> >>>>So, why not simply patch slab to rely on the string lifetime being the
> >>>>cache lifetime (or beyond) and therefore not having it take a copy?
> >
> >Well thats they way it was for a long time. There must be some reason that
> >someone started to add this copying business....  Pekka?
> >
> The question is less why we added, but rather why we're keeping.
> 
> Of course reasoning about why it was added helps (so let's try to
> determine that), but so far the only reasonably strong argument in
> favor of keeping it was robustness.

I'm pretty sure it was added because there are slab names
constructed by snprintf on a stack buffer, so the name doesn't exist
beyond the slab initialisation function call...

Cheers,

Dave.

-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/