Re: [PATCH] net: compute a more reasonable default ip6_rt_max_size
From: Arun Sharma
Date: Sat May 26 2012 - 23:55:29 EST
On 5/25/12 8:39 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
But your patch is not a "modest increase", so whats the deal ?
A modest increase would be 8192 instead of 4096, regardless of RAM size.
Yes - 8192 solves our immediate problem, but I was worrying that the
problem might resurface as ipv6 adoption becomes more widespread.
We were testing a pre-3.0 kernel that didn't have Dave's DST_NOCOUNT
patch. Will retest with that patch applied.
> More over, a boot parameter to tweak it is absolutely not needed
Agreed. Will remove that part.
Still not sure why you'd like to go for one size regardless of
totalram_pages.
-Arun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/