Hi Lee,
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:06:23PM +0800, Lee Jones wrote:On 29/05/12 18:52, Samuel Ortiz wrote:Yes, I saw the patch. I though you were saying that d28f1d was not part of theHi Lee,
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 05:27:22PM +0800, Lee Jones wrote:Hi Sam,d28f1d was part of the pull request.
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 04:29:21PM +0800, Lee Jones wrote:On 29/05/12 15:53, Axel Lin wrote:I sent a pull request to Linus yesterday, including this commit.2012/5/29 Lee Jones<lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>:On 29/05/12 14:19, Axel Lin wrote:
config AB8500_I2C_CORE is not used after commit d28f1db
"mfd: Remove confusing ab8500-i2c file and merge into ab8500-core".
Thus remove it.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin<axel.lin@xxxxxxxxx>
I have this patch embedded into a patch-set I'm going to send to ARM-SoC for
inclusion into -rc1 this afternoon. Would you mind leaving this one?
I don't mind.
But AFAIK, commit d28f1db is in mfd tree.
Any reason you want to send the patch to ARM-SoC instead of mfd tree.
I don't actually have a preference as to which tree it goes into, so
long as it's sent to Mainline on or before -rc1.
This is something different and wasn't part of the pull-request.
Right. But this is not the same thing. The patch I (and Axel) wrote
removes remnant cruft from d28f1d. I didn't see that on moving
AB8500_I2C_CORE to AB8500_CORE I left a Kconfig entry behind which
is no longer used by anything. This patch removes that cruft.
pull request and that you were going to push it through arm-soc.
Anyway, I think the Kconfig cleanup patch should go through my tree unless you
already sent it for arm-soc inclusion.