Re: [PATCH] sched/x86: Calculate booted cores after construction ofsibling_mask
From: Kamalesh Babulal
Date: Fri Jun 01 2012 - 02:48:27 EST
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2012-05-31 22:30:57]:
(snip)
> >
> > sched/x86: Calculate booted cores after construction of sibling_mask
>
> Why repeat this subject again?
>
Will take care of it from next posting.
(snip)
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> > index fd019d7..a8d78f3 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> > @@ -382,7 +382,12 @@ void __cpuinit set_cpu_sibling_map(int cpu)
> > if ((i == cpu) || (has_mc && match_llc(c, o)))
> > link_mask(llc_shared, cpu, i);
> >
> > - if ((i == cpu) || (has_mc && match_mc(c, o))) {
> > + }
> > +
> > + for_each_cpu(i, cpu_sibling_setup_mask) {
> > + o = &cpu_data(i);
> > +
> > + if ((i == cpu) || (has_mc && match_mc(c, o))) {
> > link_mask(core, cpu, i);
> >
> > /*
>
> This patch actually horribly mangles the indenting. I did the below to
> it:
Sorry about the indentation. Thanks for fixing it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/