Re: [PATCH] add new NRP power meter USB device driver

[Alan Cox]

On Fri, 1 Jun 2012 16:16:36 +0200
Oliver Neukum <oneukum@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Am Donnerstag, 31. Mai 2012, 11:21:40 schrieb Stefani Seibold:
> > On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 10:20 +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > > +		if (arg) {
> > > > > > +			ret = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(
> > > > > > +				dev->out_running.wait,
> > > > > > +				list_empty(&dev->out_running.urb_list),
> > > > > > +				msecs_to_jiffies(arg));
> > > > > > +			if (!ret)
> > > > > > +				return -ETIMEDOUT;
> > > > > > +			if (ret < 0)
> > > > > > +				return ret;
> > > > > > +			return 0;
> > > > > > +		} else {
> > > > > > +			return wait_event_interruptible(
> > > > > > +				dev->out_running.wait,
> > > > > > +				list_empty(&dev->out_running.urb_list));
> > > > > > +		}
> > > > > > +		break;
> > > > > 
> > > > > This is very ugly. If you need fsync(), then implement it.
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > fsync() did not meat the requirements, since i need in some case a
> > > > timeout for the device. poll() will also not help, since it signals only
> > > > that there is space to write.
> > > 
> > > Well, then implement fsync() with interruptible sleep and use a timer
> > > in user space.
> > > 
> > 
> > But this will not solve the problem of older software which is still
> > depending on this ioctl.
> 
> Yes. I guess it might be included in a depreated form. However
> a sane alternative must be provided.

It's a new kernel driver it's not bound to any existing API and we
regularly enforce a sane API on drivers being merged so I think the
legacy stuff is just "tough" - the out of tree driver will work fine with
any legacy code.

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/