Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dt: tegra: cardhu: register core regulatortps65911

[Mark Brown]

On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 02:44:00PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:

> Could you expand on "named property" a bit; I'm not quite sure what
> you're getting at - literally a property with name "named" (which
> would be the same as regulator-id under just a different property
> name), or ...?

Just a property where we only care about a name (ie, that the property
is present).

> > Can't we use the right hand side of this?  It appears to just be 
> > syntactic sugar without any current meaning.

> The stuff to the right of @ is the "unit address" and must match the
> value in the reg property. Using that was the first proposal I had
> above (which I also didn't like as much)

The stuff to the left of the @ is just noise right now, though - it has
no meaning currently.  It's filled in with "regulator" because we need
to put something there AFAICT.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature