Re: WARNING: at mm/page-writeback.c:1990__set_page_dirty_nobuffers+0x13a/0x170()
From: Dave Jones
Date: Sun Jun 03 2012 - 16:54:37 EST
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 02:31:39PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 11:23:29AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Things aren't happy with that patch at all.
> >
> > Yeah, at this point I think we need to just revert the compaction changes.
> >
> > Guys, what's the minimal set of commits to revert? That clearly buggy
> > "rescue_unmovable_pageblock()" function was introduced by commit
> > 5ceb9ce6fe94, but is that actually involved with the particular bug?
> > That commit seems to revert cleanly still, but is that sufficient or
> > does it even matter?
>
> I'l rerun the test with that (and Hugh's last patch) backed out, and see
> if that makes any difference.
running just over two hours with that commit reverted with no obvious ill effects so far.
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/