Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: menu: use nr_running instead of cpuload forcalculating perf mult

[Arjan van de Ven]

On 6/4/2012 8:08 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 06:48 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>> it's not about busy, it's about performance sensitive.
>> it's not a super nice proxy, no argument, but it's one of the few long
>> term ones we have.
>>
> I'm still not seeing how it makes any sense at all. Is there an actual
> workload here this matters?

yes there are, mostly server ones.

the problem isn't an individual idle, it's that the 100us-200us
latencies add up if you go in and out repeatedly, when the system is in
a situation where it is sensitive to performance (which is not an
instant thing, this is a "over the long run we're busy" thing)...
... they become a real factor.

now, "performance sensitive" is highly elusive and unmeasureable, but
load average is a reasonable approximation... well, the best we have.
(just cpu usage is not, you can have low cpu usage but block on
semaphores or IO all the time, and you're still sensitive to performance)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/